|
|
CRAFT
Does the Tax Cap Hurt Public
Education? Public
schools are the nurseries of all vice and immorality. Henry Fielding (1707-1754)
English novelist, dramatist |
|
|
CRAFT Affiliates: Will & Dupage Taxpayer's
Alliance Coalition for Public Awareness OUTRAGE-D-307, 258, 111, 61 and 53 Coalition For Our Children's Future River Grove Citizens for
Fair Taxation D- 85.5 Education Matters D-46 and
D-127 Republican Young Professionals Illinois Election Interference |
There's been a lot of
talk from school districts about how harmful PTELL (the tax cap) is to their
budgets. It has been claimed
that school districts "lose" money because of the tax cap, or that
the tax cap prevents districts from collecting money already approved by
voters. These statements
simply aren't true. Using
Enron-like accounting, the tax cap is vilified by its opponents. A simple explanation of the basic
elements of PTELL reveals the truth. The essence of PTELL
is that school districts may not increase property taxes faster than the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 5% annually, whichever is lower, plus taxes for
new construction. In recent
years, the CPI has been below 5%. The tax rate for every
year is determined by an assessment of all taxable property in the
district. These assessments
amount to a guess by the county as to the total property value within the
district. If this estimate
increases faster than the CPI, the tax rate will decrease, even if every taxpayer experiences a tax hike. A simple example shows this: Example In 2003, the property
in Taxville is assessed at $100 million. The school receives $1 million, setting the tax rate at $1
per $100 assessed valuation.
Next year, the school receives $1.02 million because the CPI grew by
2%. The county assesses the
property at $105 million.
Because of the 5% increase in assessed valuation is larger than the
increase in the CPI, the tax rate is lowered to $0.9714 per $100. ($105 million x 0.9714 per $100=$1.02
million). This is not an actual
reduction. The typical
homeowner's taxes will increase
by 2%. As many homeowners know,
property assessments are variable and often inaccurate. Had the county chosen to leave the
assessment unchanged, the tax rate would have increased to $1.02 per
$100. Either way, property taxes
increase by 2%. Myths Shattered The tax cap allows
districts to increase taxes for existing construction up to the rate of the
CPI without a referendum. School
districts do not "lose" money just because the county happens to
increase property assessments faster than the CPI. Voter approval of a
tax rate does not give a school district license to increase taxes at the
same rate as property assessments.
The occasional decrease in the school tax rate is a result of large
assessment increases, not
due to a decrease in taxes.
Voters have little knowledge of what the future holds for property
assessments. Without referenda, PTELL
allows the cost of education to increase at up to the CPI. A valid question of any taxpayer
facing a referendum is "Why is the cost of education increasing faster
than the Consumer Price Index?" A picture is worth 1,000 words The graph below shows the
amount of money collected by McHenry County on behalf of District 50 between
1990 and 2002. No education fund
referenda were passed during this time, yet there has been a 157% increase in
taxes! |
Helpful
links: Join CRAFT and/or add me to
your e-mail list. Understanding a teachers
contract Fiscally Responsible
School Board Members: |
