Legislators should think before acting on school bus safety
19 January, 2001 - By Clint Hadden - Messenger-Inquirer
I have the hardest time getting my children to think before they act. It
doesn't matter what they're doing -- playing a game, cleaning their
rooms, doing their homework -- they never look further down the road
than where they are. They could be two steps from falling off a cliff
and never know it, because they don't think about what they're doing or
where it will lead.
Of course, I know that's just the nature of kids. I'm sure as they grow
older and see the trouble that comes from not thinking ahead, they'll
learn to take a close look at a situation before making a decision.
That's what adults do, right?
A bill on the floor of the Kentucky General Assembly makes me wonder. It
seems that after a growing clamor from the public capped by a tragic
accident, the bill's sponsors have decided that Kentucky's school buses
need seat belts.
I'm sure that at this point, you must be wondering which planet I grew
up on. After all, at first glance the bill seems to make perfect sense,
especially in light of the recent tragedy that took the life of a
southern Kentucky girl. A driver loses control, a bus rolls down an
embankment, a child is thrown from a window and crushed. Even I would
admit that in that wreck, in that circumstance, a seat belt might have
made a difference. Seat belts annually save thousands of lives in
automobile accidents. What could possibly be wrong with having kids wear
seat belts on a school bus?
I'll even go so far as to admit I don't know the answer to that
question. What worries me is that, from what I've seen, the bill's
sponsors don't know the answer, either. I can't help but wonder whether
they've looked that far ahead. I worry that they've taken a single
situation and jumped at the most obvious quick fix. How effective would
seat belts be in other circumstances?
Think of another Kentucky bus tragedy. On May 14, 1988, Kentucky
suffered what remains the worst bus accident ever in the United States.
24 children and three adults on a church outing from Radcliff died when
the bus they were riding was struck head-on by a drunk driver heading
the wrong way on Interstate 71 just outside Carrollton.
Although the bus involved in that accident was owned by a church rather
than a school system, the incident led to the adoption of a number of
safety measures for school buses in the state. Additional emergency
exits were required along the side and roof of the bus. Maximum
occupancy was reduced. The flashing white light was added to buses'
roofs.
But nobody discussed adding seat belts in that round of changes. Would
seat belts have made a difference in Carrollton?
Look at the facts of that night. The bus carried about 60 children
ranging in age from 10 to 18, along with a number of chaperones. Many
were asleep and didn't even notice the crash, which makes sense -- a
bus carries a lot more mass than a pickup truck driven by a drunk. The
crash would have made a lot of noise, but the bus wouldn't have
experienced a sudden deceleration. The force of that crash didn't hurt a
single child, but it was enough to push a piece of metal through the
bus's fuel tank, causing a leak. The gasoline ignited. Sixty children
and adults scrambled to get out the rear emergency exit, but
overcrowding and an obstructed aisle slowed them down. In the two
minutes it took for the bus to become completely engulfed in flames, 27
bodies fell on top of one another by the bus's exit.
Imagine how that night would have been different had those kids been
wearing seat belts.
What if next time, instead of middle and high schoolers, the burning
bus carries frightened first graders strapped to their seats because
some well-meaning legislator failed to think ahead? Can we trust a
panicked child to release a seat belt in that circumstance? Will a
teacher, bus driver, or chaperone have time to unstrap those too
frightened to act?
I admit, I'm no traffic safety expert. I may be jumping at shadows. The
bus crash at Carrollton was just one of a thousand ways a bus can become
involved in an accident. For all I know, seat belts may very well be
the answer to increasing bus safety, and my concerns may be completely
unfounded. But I'd rather not rush to make a decision which is later
proven wrong by 27 deaths -- or worse.
Instead of acting for the sake of acting, why don't we take a few
breaths, step back, and really examine the issue. Conduct a study or
two. Find out what really causes the majority of school bus injuries,
and then make a wise, informed decision as to what we need to do to
prevent them. Then I'll be satisfied that we've done everything we can
to insure the safety of our children.