AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCHUTZHUND SPORT
Jim Engel Copyright 1993
As the last century drew to a close,
the industrial revolution was in the process of changing a centuries old way of
life throughout Europe, altering the very fabric of society. In many different
regions, diverse groups of men realized that the indigenous working dogs of the
farmer, drover and stockman were in imminent danger of being lost forever
because of the rapid modernization of agrarian life. Separately and in small
groups they sought to gather together and preserve the various regional working
types and form them into breeds. Their legacy to us is the German Shepherd, the
Rottweiler, the Bouvier des Flandres and the other herding and working breeds
as we know them today.
Since the primary objective of these
men was the preservation of the working heritage, it is not surprising that as
they created their various organizations and evolved formal standards a number
of working trial systems were devised. The primary purpose of these trials was
to serve as a gauge of working character so as to facilitate the identification
of animals suitable for consideration as breeding stock. In this way, the
working trial served the purification of the soul just as the conformation show
served to consolidate correct, uniform physical structure. The sporting aspect
drew in many who enjoyed the training and then the competitive nature of the
trial itself. It would seem that the desire to go out and see whose horse is
faster or whose dog is stronger, quicker and more courageous is as old as the
domestication process itself.
Among the earliest systems was that
devised by the creators of the German Shepherd Dog, that is, the Schutzhund
(protection dog) trial. Others include the KNPV competition (the Dutch Police
Trials) and the Ring Sport of Belgium, which date from the same era. For a
variety of reasons, including the early and strong popularity of the Shepherd,
the Schutzhund trial has become predominant, and is rapidly evolving as the
primary arena in which the protective heritage breeds demonstrate their working
character and the quality of their training. This trend is strong in Europe
beyond Germany and its scope is in fact world wide. The predominant rules are
those of the VDH (the West German kennel club) although there is a slightly
different FCI (The World canine organization) version.
Although Schutzhund competition is
usually open to any dog capable of the work, the primary interest is among the
fanciers of the protective heritage breeds such as the Doberman Pincher,
Boxier, German Shepherd, Giant Schnauzer, Bouvier des Flandres and the
Rottweiler. Patterns in Europe and America vary, with the Boxier for instance
being very active in Germany but virtually never seen in North American
competition.
A review of the objectives of
training and working trial systems in general serves as an effective
introduction to a discussion of the Schutzhund sport in particular. These
include:
· Identification of those dogs suitable
to be bred, that is, of sound temperament, willing to work and of correct
structure.
· Preparation of the individual dog to
serve the purpose of its breed, be it hunting, herding or protection of family
and property.
· Provision of sport and recreation for
man and beast that brings out the best qualities of both.
Since the Schutzhund program is
primarily for dogs of the protective heritage, its emphasis is on those
qualities necessary in such dogs, such as initiative, courage and
responsibility. The three phases of the program are:
TRACKING where the dog uses his olfactory capability
to follow the path taken by his handler or another person.
OBEDIENCE heeling, retrieval of objects and other
exercises that demonstrate cooperation and handler control.
PROTECTION search out and hold of an adversary,
close in defense of the leader and a remote attack on an aggressor.
There are three progressively more
difficult levels of competition that lead to the Schutzhund titles I through
III. Many dogs go on to compete repetitively at the Schutzhund III level in
order to achieve the highest possible score and to qualify for participation in
various annual championship events. There is also an advanced tracking title
and a number of other specialized degrees.
Among the factors contributing to
the usefulness of the dog is his incredibly sensitive nose, which makes the
sense of smell so totally superior to that of a human being that a dog
virtually lives in another world. The olfactory sensitivity adds another
dimension, a further capability, to the human/canine team. The dog can locate a
lost child, detect the presence of narcotics or warn of a hidden adversary in
time to save a life.
Tracking is thus an integral facet
of the program in order to measure and enhance this most useful faculty. The
test is conducted in an open field where a person walks a prescribed route
several hundred yards long and drops a number of articles, such as a glove,
which the dog must locate. Elementary level tracks are laid by the handler,
more advanced competition uses a different person. The track is often laid in a
plowed field rather than one with vegetation or in a pasture.
The track is aged for a period
according to the title being sought (20 minutes to an hour) after which the dog
is taken to the marked starting point and sent out, usually on a line. (The
handler has the option of sending his dog off lead, but I have never seen this
done.) It is necessary to stay ten meters behind the dog except when he picks
up a dropped article or indicates its presence by laying down or sitting. The
difficulty of a particular track is dependent on the nature of the vegetation
and the weather. Damp, cool, still conditions are generally the most favorable.
Early in the morning is often the best time of day.
The obedience exercises require the
dog to heel at the handler's side on a route with turns, changes of pace and
distractions such as gun shots and a group of milling persons. The dog must be
left in the down, sitting and standing positions and come when called. Objects
thrown by the handler are to be retrieved on command. This is done "on the
flat" and over a one meter barrier. The dog must go out away from the
handler and then down on command. The gun sure AKC obedience competitor at the
CDX level will find the Schutzhund I obedience routine familiar, the only
additional exercise being the go out which is introduced at the Utility level
under the AKC system.
A fundamentally different character
of Schutzhund obedience is due to the arena, that is, the fact that it is
conducted in an open field rather than a small, confined ring. This is a
significant consideration for the team with a large dog, which is at a
substantial disadvantage in the typical cramped AKC ring. Within broad limits
the handler has much latitude to adapt the size and order of the heeling
pattern to his own dog. That a beast heels a couple of inches ahead or behind
or sits slightly crooked is not of earth shaking consequence, for the purpose
is to demonstrate control, cooperation and working willingness rather than to
turn the dog into an ultra precise heeling machine.
The protection exercises involve a
number of simulated attacks by a human adversary who wears padded leather pants
and a padded sleeve which the dog bites. (In Schutzhund the dog is trained to
bite only the sleeve; in other forms of competition he is encouraged to bite
either an arm or a leg or go directly to the body. The agitator's protective
equipment is substantially different in such instances.) Once on the sleeve,
the agitator will strike the dog with a bamboo stick to establish the
willingness to persist in the face of a counter attack. The dog is trained to
respond to an active aggressor, and that when the helper stands still he is to
watch and bark but may not bite. Control and discipline are recognized as
essential attributes of the well trained dog. The purpose of the protection
program is not to produce a weapon that will automatically attack at the least
excuse, but rather a dog who will respond to a direct threat in the appropriate
manner.
Although tracking, obedience and
protection are the three phrases of the program, the divisions are more
apparent than real, for each facet of the training must contribute in harmony
to the balanced whole, result in a fundamentally sound dog, or they mean
nothing. In a correct program there is tremendous synergism, the lessons of one
phase positively reinforcing those of the others. The tracking builds
confidence and initiative that carries over as an alert, positive attitude in
the obedience. Obedience teaches discipline and responsiveness to the handler,
which reinforces the precision necessary for high tracking scores and paves the
way for the control aspects of the protection work. And the enthusiasm of most
dogs for the man work carries them through the long haul, provides the spark
that makes training day the best part of the dog's life. The very best
Schutzhund program does not train tracking, obedience and protection, it does
not even consider the dog as a whole and train him, rather it trains the team,
the dog and his leader together.
The trial generally starts with the
tracking early in the morning, since that is the most favorable time for the
dog to track, and because there is a long day's work ahead if there is a full
slate of ten or twelve dogs. The judge begins by assigning track layers and
supervising the laying of the tracks. Each team in turn reports and is sent out
to attempt their track.
The judge will often conduct a
preliminary temperament test in which he will purposely pressure the dog,
perhaps by walking between him and his handler and pushing him with his knee.
The dog who shows a fearful or inappropriately aggressive reaction is excused
on the spot. It is the judge's right and obligation to devise whatever tests he
believes to be necessary to establish the stability of each dog as they progress
through the day. It is necessary that Schutzhund judge have significant
latitude in conducting the trial in that his duties are by far the most
difficult and serious one can take on in the entire scope of canine affairs.
Put quite simply, the future of the working heritage is in his hands each time
he steps on the field.
When two dogs have completed their
track, the judge will in the presence of the handler and his dog, and any
others who care to listen, give a brief critique of the performance and announce
the scores. A primary purpose of this is education, as the judge will often not
only point why he has taken points away, but go on to suggest improvements in
training approach to correct the problems. Teaching is in fact the essence of
the judge's role, and a trial conducted by a good one is an educational
encounter as well.
The judge's critique does a great
deal to enhance the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship, for the audience may
find out what he has seen that was not apparent from their vantage point. They
will often find out that they noted a detail that he in fact missed, for no man
can see everything when there are two dogs and two handlers on the field, often
widely separated. The noted judge Jean-Claude Balu makes a point that bears repeating:
it is the judge's responsibility to score according to what he actually sees
and hears, that while he will on occasion know that something has occurred when
his vision was blocked or his attention diverted he must not deduct points. It
is important that those in the audience be aware of this distinction.
There is no doubt that the necessity
of giving a critique and announcing scores immediately after the exercise puts
pressure on a judge, as there is no such thing as having a ring steward post
the scores and being long gone before anyone knows what went down.
Perhaps the most challenging aspect
of Schutzhund competition is not that the dog must track, execute the obedience
exercises and show protective capability. Rather the real challenge is that each
of these three must be done successfully on the same day in order to earn a
title. It would be much easier if you could get the beast up for tracking next
week, pass the obedience after a couple of tries next spring and then worry
about the protection work! The comprehensiveness of the test is the essence of
its validity, for the dog who attains the degree under a competent judge is in
most instances a legitimate working dog. An occasional unsure dog may have a
lucky day and get through, and judges, being human, are on occasion too
lenient. There are of course distinctions in that some pass without a high
score or are not able to attain a higher title.
There are reservations in many minds
about protection training of dogs by private individuals. These questions are
relevant, for enhancing a dog's willingness and ability to perform an effective
attack on a human being is very serious business. One view is that nobody
should be permitted to keep or breed animals capable of harming a man, that the
emasculation of our utility breeds is a noble service to mankind. Perhaps the
happy day when no man need be concerned with defense of family and property is
on the horizon, perhaps our all powerful government is about to introduce a
global program to incapacitate the criminal element (surly the best kept secret
of recent years!), rendering dogs with the protective potential superfluous.
You may not believe it, and I may not believe it, but by and large contemporary
American breeders of working dogs are well on the way to being prepared for the
new era, well on the way to rendering our protective heritage breeds impotent!
But if the breeding and possession
of dogs with credible protective capability is to be a valid prerogative of the
individual citizen, there must be a means to encourage responsible ownership
and provide the necessary training and support. The Schutzhund movement has a
major role to play in this.
Proper training does not create
something that was not there in the first place, for the dog that can be
effectively trained was physically capable before hand; his reactions simply
become more predictable and controllable. The properly protection enhanced dog
is truly a more reliable companion, for the most dangerous dog is the one apt
to bite out of fear, an inability to deal with the world at large. The strong,
confident dog who knows he can deal with whatever comes over the horizon has no
need of the preemptive bite, can wait for a real threat before taking
aggressive action.
The correct Schutzhund may be taken
out in public with confidence and introduced to guests in the home along with
the rest of the family. There is something very seriously wrong with the dog
who must be locked away when there are gusts in the home, regardless of breed
or training history. The prime purpose of the Schutzhund sport is the provision
of strong, stable dogs by serving as a guide to breeding programs and providing
the training so that the individual dog can become the good canine citizen he
should be, an animal that can participate in all aspects of the day by day life
of his family.
There are those who would have you
believe that there is no need to train a dog in order to bring out the
protective potential, that a particular breed is made up of "naturally
protective" individuals. This is well and good if one finds it of comfort
and has no real need, there is after all the place for the placebo. But if one
intends to go in harms way, to depend on the dog for assistance when the going
gets rough, there are two very sound reasons for protection training. In the
first place, the dog that is not tested is simply an unknown quantity, for
there are some dogs in every breed that just don't have what it takes, and it
is impossible to identify them without testing each candidate. Finding your dog
inadequate when he fails to respond to a real attack may mean that you never
have the opportunity to replace him with an adequate dog.
The other reason for protection
training is that many dogs are taught from a young age that any sign of aggression,
even in play, is not allowed and will in fact result in being cuffed in the
head. Dogs are sensitive, they can be tremendously inhibited without the
owner's being aware of the process. The well trained obedience or show ring
competitor is at a particular disadvantage in that they are apt to ignore the
mugger thinking he is just another "distraction" and expect you to be
pleased at the show of good manners! Many dogs will simply stand confused, not
know how to react, when a simulated attack on the owner occurs as part of an
evaluation. Their training has blunted the protective instinct, rendered it
impotent when most needed.
Since the sport is a gauge of the
working potential of the protective breeds, its credibility would seem to be
dependent on the link between successful participation in a trial and practical
applications such as police work or family protection. It is to be understood
up front that it would be most foolish to take your high scoring Schutzhund III
to a tough neighborhood and insult the natives, expecting him to spare you the
normal consequences of such a foolish action! When the chips are down the dog
may realize that this is not a game and head for the hills. On the sport field
most dogs understand quite well for the agitator must play by the rules and may
only strike back in a prescribed manner with limited force.
It would seem reasonable that the
capable boxer would be an effective street fighter and most of them probably
would, but this is not necessarily true in every case. Similarly, most good
sport dogs have the potential for a real protective functionality that could be
readily enhanced with a minimum of additional training. The protection test is
a simulated situation, somewhat stylized and not totally realistic. There are
those dogs who can by careful training be acclimated to the sport situation and
yet who would likely falter when faced with a real, unrehearsed, threat. The
more skilled and experienced the judge and helper, the less likely these
boarder line dogs are to pass a protection test.
The experienced trainer will usually
have a good idea of which dogs are dependent on the familiarly of the padded
sleeve as permission to bite and which would respond to a real situation,
attack regardless of the garb of the aggressor. A hidden sleeve, that is one
compact enough to be worn under a shirt or jacket, can be used to test a dog's
reaction to a more realistic situation and also as a means of more advanced
training to insure a realistic protection functionality.
Thus while it is true that some successful
sport dogs would fail in an on the street confrontation, just as some soldiers
who are sound in training fail in combat for reasons not fully understood, it
is not necessarily the fault of the training methodology. Dogs are not machines
and it is not possible to be absolutely sure of what they will do in a new
situation.
Stability and inherent
responsibility are essential attributes of any dog to be protection trained,
either for sport or service. Children and people in general are going to walk up
and handle the police dog just as they are going to approach the private
citizen's sport trained dog. It is pointless to say that they should know
better, the simple fact is that it is going to happen. Fair or not, the burden
is on the dog and his owner. The dog who threatens or bites innocent people
simply cannot be tolerated; and it is a tribute to the stability of the animals
and the skill of those doing the training that this high standard is almost
universally met.
Although Schutzhund training and competition
is a sport, it is also a very serious business with important obligations for
those who choose to participate. The decision to become involved should thus be
made only after careful investigation of what is involved and careful
consideration of the implications of a commitment. Many who become interested
are likely to be subject to subtle warnings such as "One of your kids is
going to give the attack command, how will you feel when a neighborhood child
is mauled by your vicious Schutzhund dog and ends up in the hospital?"
Is protection training a dog in fact
equivalent to leaving a loaded pistol on the dining room table? Does it
increase the likelihood of a serious incident resulting in injury to an
innocent person? The answer is a qualified no, and the qualifications are a
sound dog and sound training methodology. It is a simple fact that owning a dog
physically capable of injury to a human being involves an element of risk, for
several times each year there are newspaper reports of a death of a human
being, all too often a child, as a result of an attack by a dog or dogs. In a
sense the fact that such incidents are reported in detail is positive, in that
very few of the 25,000 deaths that occur as a consequence of mixing alcohol and
motor vehicles are interesting enough for much newspaper coverage. But even one
death is of course one too many.
The fact is that very few if any of
these incidents involve protection trained dogs, although I do not claim that
such dogs are less likely to be involved; I simply have no relevant statistical
information. What I do know is that by building the dog's confidence in himself
and enhancing the handler's control and understanding the properly trained
Schutzhund dog is a better canine citizen, substantially less likely to be
involved in an irresponsible action after his training than before. One of the
primary causes of dog bite incidents is the fear motivated preemptive action by
the dog that was not properly socialized and/or of inherently unstable
character.
The sport trained dog is exposed to
many situations that require restraint and self control as a normal part of his
training and living with his partner. In the properly run Schutzhund club,
unstable dogs are recognized as such before the protection training begins or
advances very far and the owner made aware of the danger he is living with. If
a dog is refused training and put down or more closely watched as a consequence
the safety of the public is enhanced by one less potentially dangerous dog.
The danger that a child will send a
trained dog against an innocent person and cause an injury is simply not a
serious concern if proper precautions are taken. The Schutzhund dog is taught
to respond only to the active adult aggressor rather than a passive person. He
understands full well that it is the commands of adult family members that must
be obeyed, those of small children are in general regarded with tolerant
amusement. It is the situation and tone of voice that leads to the aggressive
response rather than the actual words used.
The owner of a dog of any of the
protective breeds takes on important responsibilities, for they are capable of
a great deal of damage. Schutzhund training, when applied to a sound dog in
responsible hands, is an effective means of fulfilling these responsibilities,
for it provides an enhanced level of discipline and control that renders
unjustified aggression less likely. Also, the discipline also provides the
ability to call back a dog when necessary, thus providing an extra margin of
safety.
Although not likely, it is
conceivable that a dog could be taught to make an unprovoked attack on verbal
command and that a child could then invoke the trained response. But the same
child could also abuse an automobile or alcohol with tragic results; and these
are much more common occurrences as the reader of any newspaper is well aware.
The owner of a Shepherd or Bouvier must teach his children respect for the
potential of the dog, just a he should teach respect for the automobile,
alcohol, power tools and the many other things that have legitimate purposes
but are nevertheless potentially dangerous. This is a very serious
responsibility that every dog owner should be made to understand.
As in any physically active sport,
there is an element of risk on the training field where a single lapse in
concentration can be the cause of an injury. The agitator is the most likely
candidate; and he understands the risks before stepping on the field and
picking up the sleeve. The point is that it is his own choice, the
gratification of working the dog and contributing to his progress is
satisfactory compensations for placing himself in jeopardy.
Each of us who participate - as
instructor, agitator or trainer - is responsible for the safety of those involved
and for producing reliable dogs suitable for living with their families in
contemporary American society. Each person interested in participation must
make his own evaluation of the overall merits of the program and make his own
commitment. He should also contemplate the inherent risks of owning a dog with
the protective potential without knowing how it is likely to respond in a
situation he regards as provocative, or even which situations will be so
regarded. The owner of the Schutzhund trained dog has the advantage of knowing
first hand how his dog will respond to a wide variety of stressful
circumstances.